国产 无码 综合区,色欲AV无码国产永久播放,无码天堂亚洲国产AV,国产日韩欧美女同一区二区

ORA-01033: ORACLE initialization or shutdown in progress---惜分飛

這篇具有很好參考價值的文章主要介紹了ORA-01033: ORACLE initialization or shutdown in progress---惜分飛。希望對大家有所幫助。如果存在錯誤或未考慮完全的地方,請大家不吝賜教,您也可以點擊"舉報違法"按鈕提交疑問。

客戶反饋數(shù)據(jù)庫使用plsql dev登錄報ORA-01033: ORACLE initialization or shutdown in progress的錯誤
?

ORA-01033: ORACLE initialization or shutdown in progress---惜分飛,oracle恢復(fù),oracle


出現(xiàn)該錯誤一般是由于數(shù)據(jù)庫沒有正常open成功,查看oracle 告警日志發(fā)現(xiàn)

Mon Jan 22 16:55:50 2024

Database mounted in Exclusive Mode

Lost write protection disabled

Completed: alter database mount exclusive

alter database open

Beginning crash recovery of 1 threads

?parallel recovery started with 15 processes

Started redo scan

Completed redo scan

?read 139 KB redo, 70 data blocks need recovery

Errors in file d:\app\administrator\diag\rdbms\orcl\orcl\trace\orcl_ora_7792.trc? (incident=20565):

ORA-00600: ??????, ??: [kcratr_nab_less_than_odr], [1], [1916], [28210], [28222], [], [], [], [], [], [], []

Incident details in: d:\app\administrator\diag\rdbms\orcl\orcl\incident\incdir_20565\orcl_ora_7792_i20565.trc

Mon Jan 22 16:55:57 2024

Trace dumping is performing id=[cdmp_20240122165557]

Aborting crash recovery due to error 600

Errors in file d:\app\administrator\diag\rdbms\orcl\orcl\trace\orcl_ora_7792.trc:

ORA-00600: ??????, ??: [kcratr_nab_less_than_odr], [1], [1916], [28210], [28222], [], [], [], [], [], [], []

Errors in file d:\app\administrator\diag\rdbms\orcl\orcl\trace\orcl_ora_7792.trc:

ORA-00600: ??????, ??: [kcratr_nab_less_than_odr], [1], [1916], [28210], [28222], [], [], [], [], [], [], []

ORA-600 signalled during: alter database open...

這個錯誤比較常見,解決起來比較簡單,參考:
kcratr_nab_less_than_odr
12c啟動報kcratr_nab_less_than_odr
又一例ORA-600 kcratr_nab_less_than_odr
在恢復(fù)過程中中還遇到了ORA-00700 kcrf_split_brain_error錯誤,但是沒有影響數(shù)據(jù)庫open

Mon Jan 22 20:13:55 2024

alter database open

Beginning crash recovery of 1 threads

Started redo application at

?Thread 1: logseq 1916, block 27931

Recovery of Online Redo Log: Thread 1 Group 2 Seq 1916 Reading mem 0

??Mem# 0: D:\TEMP\ORCL\REDO02.LOG

Completed redo application of 0.00MB

Completed crash recovery at

?Thread 1: logseq 1916, block 28210, scn 43957072

?0 data blocks read, 0 data blocks written, 139 redo k-bytes read

Errors in file d:\app\xifenfei\diag\rdbms\orcl\orcl\trace\orcl_ora_6104.trc? (incident=15729):

ORA-00700: 軟內(nèi)部錯誤, 參數(shù): [kcrf_split_brain_error], [1], [1916], [28222], [28209], [4], [], [], [], [], [], []

Incident details in: d:\app\xifenfei\diag\rdbms\orcl\orcl\incident\incdir_15729\orcl_ora_6104_i15729.trc

Mon Jan 22 20:13:56 2024

Trace dumping is performing id=[cdmp_20240122201356]

Mon Jan 22 20:13:56 2024

Thread 1 advanced to log sequence 1917 (thread open)

Thread 1 opened at log sequence 1917

??Current log# 3 seq# 1917 mem# 0: D:\TEMP\ORCL\REDO03.LOG

Successful open of redo thread 1

Mon Jan 22 20:13:56 2024

SMON: enabling cache recovery

Verifying file header compatibility for 11g tablespace encryption..

Verifying 11g file header compatibility for tablespace encryption completed

SMON: enabling tx recovery

Database Characterset is AL32UTF8

replication_dependency_tracking turned off (no async multimaster replication found)

WARNING: AQ_TM_PROCESSES is set to 0. System operation???????????????????? might be adversely affected.

Completed: alter database open

ORA-01033: ORACLE initialization or shutdown in progress---惜分飛,oracle恢復(fù),oracle


至此數(shù)據(jù)庫open成功但是dbv檢測system有很多壞塊需要分析處理

C:\Users\XIFENFEI>dbv file=d:/temp/orcl/system01.dbf

DBVERIFY: Release 11.2.0.1.0 - Production on 星期一 1月 22 21:07:18 2024

Copyright (c) 1982, 2009, Oracle and/or its affiliates.? All rights reserved.

DBVERIFY - 開始驗證: FILE = D:\TEMP\ORCL\SYSTEM01.DBF

頁 106278 流入 - 很可能是介質(zhì)損壞

Corrupt block relative dba: 0x00419f26 (file 1, block 106278)

Fractured block found during dbv:

Data in bad block:

?type: 6 format: 2 rdba: 0x00419f26

?last change scn: 0x0000.01410f78 seq: 0x2 flg: 0x04

?spare1: 0x0 spare2: 0x0 spare3: 0x0

?consistency value in tail: 0x00000000

?check value in block header: 0xbf11

?computed block checksum: 0xaf18

頁 106279 標記為損壞

Corrupt block relative dba: 0x00419f27 (file 1, block 106279)

Bad header found during dbv:

Data in bad block:

?type: 178 format: 3 rdba: 0xc8c9c1b6

?last change scn: 0x0000.0a0df8c7 seq: 0x0 flg: 0x00

?spare1: 0xbf spare2: 0xc9 spare3: 0xc9bf

?consistency value in tail: 0x00000000

?check value in block header: 0xbbb2

?block checksum disabled

頁 106280 標記為損壞

Corrupt block relative dba: 0x00419f28 (file 1, block 106280)

Bad header found during dbv:

Data in bad block:

?type: 178 format: 3 rdba: 0xc8c9c1b6

?last change scn: 0x0000.0a0df8c7 seq: 0x0 flg: 0x00

?spare1: 0xbf spare2: 0xc9 spare3: 0xc9bf

?consistency value in tail: 0x00000000

?check value in block header: 0xbbb2

?block checksum disabled

頁 106281 標記為損壞

Corrupt block relative dba: 0x00419f29 (file 1, block 106281)

Bad header found during dbv:

Data in bad block:

?type: 178 format: 3 rdba: 0xc8c9c1b6

?last change scn: 0x0000.0a0df8c7 seq: 0x0 flg: 0x00

?spare1: 0xbf spare2: 0xc9 spare3: 0xc9bf

?consistency value in tail: 0x00000000

?check value in block header: 0xbbb2

?block checksum disabled

頁 106282 標記為損壞

Corrupt block relative dba: 0x00419f2a (file 1, block 106282)

Bad header found during dbv:

Data in bad block:

?type: 178 format: 3 rdba: 0xc8c9c1b6

?last change scn: 0x0000.0a0df8c7 seq: 0x0 flg: 0x00

?spare1: 0xbf spare2: 0xc9 spare3: 0xc9bf

?consistency value in tail: 0x00000000

?check value in block header: 0xbbb2

?block checksum disabled

頁 106283 標記為損壞

Corrupt block relative dba: 0x00419f2b (file 1, block 106283)

Bad header found during dbv:

Data in bad block:

?type: 178 format: 3 rdba: 0xc8c9c1b6

?last change scn: 0x0000.0a0df8c7 seq: 0x0 flg: 0x00

?spare1: 0xbf spare2: 0xc9 spare3: 0xc9bf

?consistency value in tail: 0x00000000

?check value in block header: 0xbbb2

?block checksum disabled

頁 106284 標記為損壞

Corrupt block relative dba: 0x00419f2c (file 1, block 106284)

Bad header found during dbv:

Data in bad block:

?type: 178 format: 3 rdba: 0xc8c9c1b6

?last change scn: 0x0000.0a0df8c7 seq: 0x0 flg: 0x00

?spare1: 0xbf spare2: 0xc9 spare3: 0xc9bf

?consistency value in tail: 0x00000000

?check value in block header: 0xbbb2

?block checksum disabled

頁 106285 標記為損壞

Corrupt block relative dba: 0x00419f2d (file 1, block 106285)

Bad header found during dbv:

Data in bad block:

?type: 178 format: 3 rdba: 0xc8c9c1b6

?last change scn: 0x0000.0a0df8c7 seq: 0x0 flg: 0x00

?spare1: 0xbf spare2: 0xc9 spare3: 0xc9bf

?consistency value in tail: 0x00000000

?check value in block header: 0xbbb2

?block checksum disabled

頁 106286 標記為損壞

Corrupt block relative dba: 0x00419f2e (file 1, block 106286)

Bad header found during dbv:

Data in bad block:

?type: 178 format: 3 rdba: 0xc8c9c1b6

?last change scn: 0x0000.0a0df8c7 seq: 0x0 flg: 0x00

?spare1: 0xbf spare2: 0xc9 spare3: 0xc9bf

?consistency value in tail: 0x2c310602

?check value in block header: 0xbbb2

?block checksum disabled

頁 143094 流入 - 很可能是介質(zhì)損壞

Corrupt block relative dba: 0x00422ef6 (file 1, block 143094)

Fractured block found during dbv:

Data in bad block:

?type: 6 format: 2 rdba: 0x00422ef6

?last change scn: 0x0000.028f863b seq: 0x2 flg: 0x04

?spare1: 0x0 spare2: 0x0 spare3: 0x0

?consistency value in tail: 0x00000000

?check value in block header: 0xda23

?computed block checksum: 0x4210

頁 143095 標記為損壞

Corrupt block relative dba: 0x00422ef7 (file 1, block 143095)

Bad header found during dbv:

Data in bad block:

?type: 178 format: 3 rdba: 0xc8c9c1b6

?last change scn: 0x0000.0a0df8c7 seq: 0x0 flg: 0x00

?spare1: 0xbf spare2: 0xc9 spare3: 0xc9bf

?consistency value in tail: 0x00000000

?check value in block header: 0xbbb2

?block checksum disabled

頁 143096 標記為損壞

Corrupt block relative dba: 0x00422ef8 (file 1, block 143096)

Bad header found during dbv:

Data in bad block:

?type: 178 format: 3 rdba: 0xc8c9c1b6

?last change scn: 0x0000.0a0df8c7 seq: 0x0 flg: 0x00

?spare1: 0xbf spare2: 0xc9 spare3: 0xc9bf

?consistency value in tail: 0x00000000

?check value in block header: 0xbbb2

?block checksum disabled

頁 143097 標記為損壞

Corrupt block relative dba: 0x00422ef9 (file 1, block 143097)

Bad header found during dbv:

Data in bad block:

?type: 178 format: 3 rdba: 0xc8c9c1b6

?last change scn: 0x0000.0a0df8c7 seq: 0x0 flg: 0x00

?spare1: 0xbf spare2: 0xc9 spare3: 0xc9bf

?consistency value in tail: 0x00000000

?check value in block header: 0xbbb2

?block checksum disabled

頁 143098 標記為損壞

Corrupt block relative dba: 0x00422efa (file 1, block 143098)

Bad header found during dbv:

Data in bad block:

?type: 178 format: 3 rdba: 0xc8c9c1b6

?last change scn: 0x0000.0a0df8c7 seq: 0x0 flg: 0x00

?spare1: 0xbf spare2: 0xc9 spare3: 0xc9bf

?consistency value in tail: 0x00000000

?check value in block header: 0xbbb2

?block checksum disabled

頁 143099 標記為損壞

Corrupt block relative dba: 0x00422efb (file 1, block 143099)

Bad header found during dbv:

Data in bad block:

?type: 178 format: 3 rdba: 0xc8c9c1b6

?last change scn: 0x0000.0a0df8c7 seq: 0x0 flg: 0x00

?spare1: 0xbf spare2: 0xc9 spare3: 0xc9bf

?consistency value in tail: 0x00000000

?check value in block header: 0xbbb2

?block checksum disabled

頁 143100 標記為損壞

Corrupt block relative dba: 0x00422efc (file 1, block 143100)

Bad header found during dbv:

Data in bad block:

?type: 178 format: 3 rdba: 0xc8c9c1b6

?last change scn: 0x0000.0a0df8c7 seq: 0x0 flg: 0x00

?spare1: 0xbf spare2: 0xc9 spare3: 0xc9bf

?consistency value in tail: 0x00000000

?check value in block header: 0xbbb2

?block checksum disabled

頁 143101 標記為損壞

Corrupt block relative dba: 0x00422efd (file 1, block 143101)

Bad header found during dbv:

Data in bad block:

?type: 178 format: 3 rdba: 0xc8c9c1b6

?last change scn: 0x0000.0a0df8c7 seq: 0x0 flg: 0x00

?spare1: 0xbf spare2: 0xc9 spare3: 0xc9bf

?consistency value in tail: 0x00000000

?check value in block header: 0xbbb2

?block checksum disabled

頁 143102 標記為損壞

Corrupt block relative dba: 0x00422efe (file 1, block 143102)

Bad header found during dbv:

Data in bad block:

?type: 178 format: 3 rdba: 0xc8c9c1b6

?last change scn: 0x0000.0a0df8c7 seq: 0x0 flg: 0x00

?spare1: 0xbf spare2: 0xc9 spare3: 0xc9bf

?consistency value in tail: 0x8a780602

?check value in block header: 0xbbb2

?block checksum disabled

DBVERIFY - 驗證完成

檢查的頁總數(shù): 152320

處理的頁總數(shù) (數(shù)據(jù)): 115189

失敗的頁總數(shù) (數(shù)據(jù)): 0

處理的頁總數(shù) (索引): 13086

失敗的頁總數(shù) (索引): 0

處理的頁總數(shù) (其他): 9741

處理的總頁數(shù) (段)? : 1

失敗的總頁數(shù) (段)? : 0

空的頁總數(shù): 14286

標記為損壞的總頁數(shù): 18

流入的頁總數(shù): 2

加密的總頁數(shù)??????? : 0

最高塊 SCN??????????? : 44036082 (0.44036082)

通過分析aud$的extent,確認這些壞塊全部屬于該對象

SQL> select block_id,blocks from dba_extents where segment_name='AUD$';

??BLOCK_ID???? BLOCKS

---------- ----------

…………

????102016?????? 1024

????103040?????? 1024

????104064?????? 1024

????105088?????? 1024

????106112?????? 1024

…………

????141056?????? 1024

????142080?????? 1024

????143104?????? 1024

已選擇124行。

處理方法比較簡單,直接truncate aud$表即可文章來源地址http://www.zghlxwxcb.cn/news/detail-817725.html

到了這里,關(guān)于ORA-01033: ORACLE initialization or shutdown in progress---惜分飛的文章就介紹完了。如果您還想了解更多內(nèi)容,請在右上角搜索TOY模板網(wǎng)以前的文章或繼續(xù)瀏覽下面的相關(guān)文章,希望大家以后多多支持TOY模板網(wǎng)!

本文來自互聯(lián)網(wǎng)用戶投稿,該文觀點僅代表作者本人,不代表本站立場。本站僅提供信息存儲空間服務(wù),不擁有所有權(quán),不承擔相關(guān)法律責任。如若轉(zhuǎn)載,請注明出處: 如若內(nèi)容造成侵權(quán)/違法違規(guī)/事實不符,請點擊違法舉報進行投訴反饋,一經(jīng)查實,立即刪除!

領(lǐng)支付寶紅包贊助服務(wù)器費用

相關(guān)文章

  • Patch SCN一鍵解決ORA-600 2662故障---惜分飛

    Patch SCN一鍵解決ORA-600 2662故障---惜分飛

    客戶強制重啟庫之后,數(shù)據(jù)庫啟動報ORA-600 2037,ORA-745 kcbs_reset_pool/kcbzre1等錯誤 Wed Aug 09 13:25:38 2023 alter database mount exclusive Successful mount of redo thread 1, with mount id 1672229586 Database mounted in Exclusive Mode Lost write protection disabled Completed: alter database mount exclusive alter database open Beginning crash

    2024年02月13日
    瀏覽(21)
  • Oracle誤刪除數(shù)據(jù)文件恢復(fù)---惜分飛

    有客戶通過sftp誤刪除oracle數(shù)據(jù)文件,咨詢我們是否可以恢復(fù),通過遠程上去檢查,發(fā)現(xiàn)運氣不錯,數(shù)據(jù)庫還沒有crash,通過句柄找到被刪除文件 oracle@cwgstestdb[testwctdb] /proc/20611/fd $ ls -ltr total 0 lr-x------ 1 oracle oinstall 64 Feb 20 14:03 9 - /oracle/db19c/rdbms/mesg/oraus .msb lrwx------ 1 oracle oinstall 64 F

    2024年02月22日
    瀏覽(27)
  • win系統(tǒng)刪除oracle數(shù)據(jù)文件恢復(fù)---惜分飛

    win系統(tǒng)刪除oracle數(shù)據(jù)文件恢復(fù)---惜分飛

    有客戶聯(lián)系我們,說win平臺下的數(shù)據(jù)庫,在由于空間緊張,在關(guān)閉數(shù)據(jù)庫的情況下刪除的兩個數(shù)據(jù)文件,導致數(shù)據(jù)庫無法正常訪問很多業(yè)務(wù)表,需要對其進行恢復(fù),查看alert日志發(fā)現(xiàn)大概操作,刪除文件之后,啟動數(shù)據(jù)庫失敗 Completed: alter database mount exclusive alter database open Errors in file d:

    2024年02月15日
    瀏覽(17)
  • Oracle Recovery Tools快速恢復(fù)斷電引起的無法正常啟動數(shù)據(jù)庫----惜分飛

    Oracle Recovery Tools快速恢復(fù)斷電引起的無法正常啟動數(shù)據(jù)庫----惜分飛

    由于異常斷電,數(shù)據(jù)庫啟動報錯ORA-01113和ORA-01110,ORA-00322和ORA-00312以及ORA-00314和ORA-00312錯誤 Mon Apr 17 09:35:04 2023 ALTER DATABASE OPEN Errors in file D:APPADMINISTRATORdiagrdbmsorclorcltraceorcl_ora_10192.trc: ORA-01113: 文件 1 需要介質(zhì)恢復(fù) ORA-01110: 數(shù)據(jù)文件 1: \\\'D:APPADMINISTRATORORADATAORCLSYSTEM01.DBF

    2023年04月21日
    瀏覽(31)
  • Exadata磁盤損壞導致磁盤組無法mount恢復(fù)(oracle一體機磁盤組異?;謴?fù))---惜分飛

    Exadata磁盤損壞導致磁盤組無法mount恢復(fù)(oracle一體機磁盤組異常恢復(fù))---惜分飛

    Oracle Exadata客戶,在換盤過程中,cell節(jié)點又一塊磁盤損壞,導致datac1磁盤組(該磁盤組是normal方式冗余)無法mount Thu Jul 20 22:01:21 2023 SQL alter diskgroup datac1 mount force NOTE: cache registered group DATAC1 number=1 incarn=0x0728ad12 NOTE: cache began mount (first) of group DATAC1 number=1 incarn=0x0728ad12 NOTE: Assigning

    2024年02月15日
    瀏覽(20)
  • oracle報錯:ORA-10997,ORA-09967解決

    報錯信息: ORA-10997: another startup/shutdown operation of this instance inprogress ORA-09967: unable to create or open lock file Linux-x86_64 Error: 13: Permission denied 權(quán)限問題,修改Oracle目錄權(quán)限 連接到Oracle重新啟動就好

    2024年02月15日
    瀏覽(25)
  • ORACLE還原恢復(fù)啟動時數(shù)據(jù)庫報ORA-00704, ORA-00604, ORA-00904

    ORACLE還原恢復(fù)啟動時數(shù)據(jù)庫報ORA-00704, ORA-00604, ORA-00904

    Oracle數(shù)據(jù)庫還原恢復(fù)后,執(zhí)行alter database open resetlogs時遇到下面錯誤。如下所示: 剛開始有點懵的,第一次遇到這種情形。不過搜索了一下metalink相關(guān)資料后,大致了解到是因為環(huán)境變量設(shè)置有誤導致這些錯誤出現(xiàn)的。這里先介紹一下這個案例的復(fù)雜背景: 當前機器為一個測

    2023年04月13日
    瀏覽(25)
  • 使用sqlplus連接oracle,提示ORA-01034和ORA-27101

    使用sqlplus連接oracle,提示ORA-01034和ORA-27101

    登錄時 登錄時 ?再連接數(shù)據(jù)庫就好了 ? ?

    2024年02月13日
    瀏覽(45)
  • Oracle 報錯ORA-01034: ORACLE not available(Linux),重啟

    Oracle 報錯ORA-01034: ORACLE not available(Linux),重啟

    1.切換到oracle用戶 2.重啟oracle實例 以上步驟完成后,Linux可本地連接oracle數(shù)據(jù)庫實例。 3.oracle 數(shù)據(jù)庫監(jiān)聽器命令 啟動監(jiān)聽器后,才能遠程連接。

    2024年04月23日
    瀏覽(25)
  • oracle報錯 ORA-00917: missing comma

    oracle執(zhí)行sql語句報錯,提示 oracle ORA-00917: missing comma 這是由于sql語句中缺少逗號,仔細檢查下即可。 執(zhí)行以下語句發(fā)生報錯 結(jié)果提示: 在sql語句中缺少了逗號,導致報錯。

    2024年02月14日
    瀏覽(26)

覺得文章有用就打賞一下文章作者

支付寶掃一掃打賞

博客贊助

微信掃一掃打賞

請作者喝杯咖啡吧~博客贊助

支付寶掃一掃領(lǐng)取紅包,優(yōu)惠每天領(lǐng)

二維碼1

領(lǐng)取紅包

二維碼2

領(lǐng)紅包